Ancient Aliens Debunked: A Critical Review


Last month I gave a presentation about the significant problems with the ancient astronaut theory (AAT) and the people that promote it, and I am reasonably happy with what I put together. However, to really get at these folks that live and breath AAT, it would take a product with higher visual standards than a PowerPoint and one guy talking for an hour or so.

But also last month was the release of Ancient Aliens Debunked, which is a three hour(!) documentary that shows the claims from the Ancient Aliens TV show on the History Channel (or H2), along with a thorough debunking of those claims.

The video comes with a website that for each section comes with a transcript and references. You can also watch particular pieces of the documentary, so if you are only interested in, say, the Pyramids or Ezekiel’s “spaceship”, you can jump to those discussions rather than watch the whole things. That is vastly superior to what a standard documentary could do.

The video production itself looks reasonably good (probably better than what I can do), and it has interview clips with Mike Heiser, a scholar of the Ancient Near East (ANE) and the Old Testament. Jason Colavito also provides sources for the video, but issues came up that made it impossible for him to be seen in the documentary. With one or two people to interview, that is a limitation, and I don’t think you could say the documentary is as high-quality as the BBC Horizon examination of Atlantis and the claims of Graham Hancock (video here). Nonetheless, the organization of the information by the creator of the video, Chris White, is superior for those that want to check things for themselves.

Which bring me to the critical part of the review, and why even good productions must always bring about skepticism. The information and argumentation throughout it good up until we get to the biblical portions. The discussion of Ezekiel’s wheels within wheels covered in eyes is examined and shown reasonably well to have nothing to do with spacecraft, let alone particular ones drawn from odd readings of the text. It doesn’t examine the evidence on the same points I had done, but it didn’t have to in order to argue the point. Moving on later we come to the Annunaki. But then the documentary goes off the rails talking about how the Bible is not dependent on Sumerian legend and all the flood stories around the world are a memory of an actual event, and the Bible has the most accurate memory of that event.

It’s only at this point do we realize that Chris White is a creationist, a Christian fundamentalist, and he believes his book literally. And to support his premise he has some real howlers. He mentions how Sumerian poets changed their narratives and contradicted one another, so their recollection of the ancient past is not trustworthy, but the Bible is perfectly consistent about the Flood. Has he not heard of the Documentary Hypothesis, the multiple authorship of the Pentateuch, most notable by the two versions of many stories, including the Flood, that contradict one another? That there are flood myths all over the world is also explicable by two factors: floods happen all over the place (and the various flood stories differ greatly around the world), and many of the stories most similar to the biblical one are due to missionary activities.

Looking at his sources at this point, you can see a major downturn in quality. No longer being supported by respected scholars on the subject, he jumps to creationist material, something I must poo-poo since creationist proponents are demonstrably dishonest. It shows when, for example, White cites scholars saying how the biblical story is not dependent on the Sumerian version of the Flood story, therefore they have a common source, when in fact the biblical authors were not directly influenced by the Sumerians but the Babylonians and Assyrians (and the Egyptians and Greeks perhaps as well, the on latter see Argonauts of the Desert). The resources on the construction of Noah’s Ark are also crazed since such a structure couldn’t even float in calm water (it would fall apart due to hogging, meaning it would bend, fill with water, and collapse), let alone in the greatest catastrophe in history.

If one looks away from these flaws, there is still a very good resource against AAT. If you look at the flaws, you can, in fact, see the same flaws as AAT itself has: relying on poor resources to get to a preferred conclusion and avoiding years of research to the contrary. What this also means is that no one can just point to a particular book or webpage and say “all is proven here”. We all have to do our own legwork and be skeptical, even of our fellow skeptics. It means we should also double-check what is said in other parts of the documentary to find any errors or points to expand upon. It will makes us better researchers and skeptics, and hopefully we will learn a lot along the way.

I think Christ White’s Ancient Aliens Debunked is a great resource overall; not perfect, but one of the best one-stop sites for undercutting the particular claims of the AAT. I hope he continues to do more videos in the future. (Another review by Jason Colavito can be found here.)

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Ancient Aliens Debunked: A Critical Review

  1. Pingback: Aliens Attack Nuremberg (Nürnberg)! | Fleeing Nergal, Seeking Stars

    • While I have the same position on deities as you, a religious person still has every capacity to show the glaring errors in AAT. It’s bunk independent of ideology, so long as you can rationally analyze the evidence. Which Christ White does through the vast majority of his doc. Where he uses theology to argue, that is where he will fail to convince.

      So, I would suggest a less hyperbolic response. Just because White is probably wrong about some things doesn’t mean he’s wrong about everything.

      • Quite right ! So we can assume that Christ has the capacity to identify the multitude of flaws in the Bible as I can identify some truths in the Bible. Take the great flood for instance , every religion refers to it , there is no doubt in my mind this occurred in the past .
        Maybe God and the angels are the ancient aliens , I can’t help but think religion, mythology and the ancient Alien theories are all connected somehow, if only we knew . .

      • While flood myths are common, they are hardly all the same. The Chinese version for example, has the people build dams and dikes and defeat the flood. Jason Colavito talks about that some here. We also know from geology there was no world-wide flood in the era of humans, but there are local floods and other events that can explain what inspired these sorts of stories.

        As for how religion and ancient aliens are all connected, again I refer you to Jason’s work, especially his book “The Cult of Alien Gods” which shows how AAT grew out of the work of HP Lovecraft who was mimicking the theosophic movement which was a New-agey religion based on all sorts of other myths and religious beliefs. There are connections, but they don’t have so much to do with the real world or the ancient past. Fascinating nonetheless, and endlessly so to me.

      • Although I must agree he does an excellent job of debunking all the AAT theories with use of science and actual evidence. I was still kinda disappointed when I found out he was religious though. It does make him less believable as he himself believes in the biggest myth ever told.

What's on your mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s